News

Governments Race to Repatriate Stranded Nationals as Middle East Airspace Remains Largely Shut

Aviantics Labs
6 min read
Stranded passengers at a Middle Eastern airport amidst ongoing conflict and airspace closures.

Dubai, United Arab Emirates — Five days into the most severe commercial aviation disruption since the COVID-19 pandemic, governments across the globe are scrambling to extract their citizens from a Middle East rendered largely impassable by the ongoing conflict following U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran. The human geography of the crisis is staggering: hundreds of thousands of foreign nationals — tourists, expatriate workers, transit passengers — are either stranded in place or unable to reach the region at all.

The scale of the airspace closure is almost without precedent in modern commercial aviation. The Tehran, Baghdad, Doha, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Damascus FIRs remain shut. Israel’s airspace is under total closure through at least March 6. The Emirates FIR, which covers some of the world’s heaviest traffic, is technically open but operating under Emergency Security Control of Air Traffic (ESCAT) restrictions that effectively throttle commercial movements to a trickle. Flight tracking data from Flightradar24 shows the central Middle East corridor — normally a dense web of aircraft linking Europe, Asia, and Africa — as a vast, near-empty gap. The closure struck at the heart of global connectivity. Dubai International, Abu Dhabi’s Zayed International, and Hamad International in Doha together serve as critical waypoints for hundreds of millions of passengers annually. The three carriers headquartered at those airports — Emirates, Etihad, and Qatar Airways — collectively move roughly 90,000 passengers per day through their hubs on normal operating days. None of those carriers is running anything close to normal operations.

Emirates confirmed it would keep scheduled flights suspended through at least 11:59 p.m. UAE time on March 4, while operating a limited number of repatriation and cargo flights in the interim. The airline urged passengers not to proceed to the airport without a direct notification. Etihad resumed a brief departure window from Abu Dhabi on Tuesday — 16 flights in a three-hour period, according to Flightradar24 — before that window closed again in the face of fresh missile activity. Qatar Airways has said it will provide a further operational update by Wednesday morning, with nearly 8,000 transit passengers reported stranded inside Hamad International alone. Flydubai, the low-cost subsidiary of Emirates, has mirrored its parent’s grounding. Wizz Air has suspended all flights to and from Israel, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Amman, and Saudi Arabia through at least March 7. Turkish Airlines cancelled services to Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Qatar, Syria, and the UAE. Air France, KLM, and British Airways have issued similar suspensions of varying duration.

The operational picture is not static. Fresh ballistic missile salvos early Tuesday forced three inbound flights to hold outside UAE airspace; two Etihad aircraft diverted to Muscat while an Emirates flight from Mumbai briefly reversed course before eventually completing its journey to Dubai. That kind of minute-to-minute volatility is precisely what makes resuming normal schedules so difficult. For governments, the immediate challenge is less diplomatic than logistical: how do you move people through closed airspace? The answer, increasingly, is through the southern bypass — routing via Egypt, then Saudi Arabia, then Oman — or by land, getting citizens to a functioning airport before attempting any onward flight. France, which estimates roughly 400,000 nationals across the affected countries, has deployed consular teams to Israel’s borders with Egypt and Jordan to facilitate overland exits and has established a similar corridor from the UAE through Oman and Saudi Arabia, where airspace has remained comparatively open. Charter flights are being prepared, with embassies drawing up priority lists weighted toward vulnerable travelers.

Germany is chartering two Lufthansa aircraft — one from Riyadh and one from Muscat — specifically for children, pregnant women, and people with disabilities. Tour operator TUI said it was working to repatriate cruise passengers in initial groups via Gulf carriers including Emirates, Etihad, and Qatar Airways, to the extent those carriers can operate. Italy managed one of the earliest successful extractions: a charter flight carrying 127 citizens stranded in Oman — or moved there from Dubai — landed at Rome’s Fiumicino on the evening of March 2. Spain announced its first evacuation flight from Abu Dhabi on Tuesday, with further services expected via Istanbul. Slovenia organized police-escorted bus convoys from Dubai to Muscat, giving its nationals a route to Oman’s functional airport before flying home. The United Kingdom, with an estimated 300,000 nationals in the affected region, said initial repatriation flights had landed Monday evening. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the government is “working on all options,” while Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper confirmed that 102,000 Britons had registered their presence with the Foreign Office. The U.S., which has urged Americans to depart immediately using available commercial transportation, had not announced dedicated repatriation flights as of Tuesday. Secretary of State Marco Rubio acknowledged the challenge bluntly: “It’s going to take a little time, because we don’t control the airspace.”

Australia, citing the sheer number of nationals in the region — roughly 115,000 — said the most viable path home remained commercial aviation once services resume, while declining to commit to dedicated evacuation flights. Switzerland similarly said it would not organize evacuations, though its helpline had already fielded around 2,000 inquiries. The Philippines faces a different scale of exposure: more than 2.4 million Filipino nationals work and live across the Middle East, with President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. pledging repatriation flights once conditions allow. Beyond the immediate human story, the disruption is reshaping global routing patterns in real time. Air India has rerouted its transatlantic services via Rome, cancelling European connections to Birmingham, Zurich, and Copenhagen. Long-haul flights between Europe and South or Southeast Asia — which would normally pass over Iran or the Gulf — are now arcing northward through the Caucasus and Afghanistan or looping south through Egypt. Either adds hours and fuel burn. Aviation security consultant Eric Schouten, speaking to Reuters, said passengers and airlines should expect the airspace closures to persist for a considerable period. For comparison, a previous Israeli-U.S. strike campaign against Iran in June 2025 took 12 days to resolve sufficiently for commercial aviation to return.

The financial exposure for carriers is significant. Each day of suspended or severely curtailed Gulf hub operations represents tens of millions in lost revenue for Emirates, Etihad, and Qatar Airways alone — carriers that have spent years and billions positioning themselves as indispensable connectors between East and West. What remains to be seen is whether the gradual reopening of the Emirates FIR into tightly controlled waypoint corridors represents the beginning of a broader normalization, or simply a temporary breathing space before the next round of strikes. For now, the calculus for airlines is brutally simple: the liability of flying into an active conflict zone outweighs any revenue argument. Until ballistic missile and drone activity meaningfully subsides, the world’s busiest aviation crossroads will remain, in large part, closed.

This article was produced in accordance with our editorial standards. Aviantics maintains strict editorial independence.